top of page

Comparing 3D Printing Technologies and Materials for Orthotics: What You Need to Know!



Welcome to week 3!


The advanced manufacturing era has revolutionized the orthotics industry, making it possible to produce customized, high-quality orthotics with unprecedented speed and precision. But with so many 3D printing technologies and materials available, choosing the right combination for your clinic's needs can be daunting. Let’s dive into the most common 3D printing methods and materials for orthotics, comparing their benefits and limitations to help you make informed decisions. 

 

Top 3D Printing Technologies for Orthotics 


1. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 

FDM is a widely accessible 3D printing method that works by extruding melted thermoplastic layer by layer. 

  • Pros: Affordable, suitable for simpler orthotic designs, and easy to access. 

  • Cons: Lower accuracy, rougher surface finishes, and fewer material options compared to advanced methods. 


2. Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) 

Using lasers to fuse powdered material, SLS creates durable and complex designs with a smooth finish. 

  • Pros: Perfect for intricate geometries, highly durable, and provides excellent surface quality. 

  • Cons: Higher costs and less availability in smaller clinics. 


3. Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) 

HP's MJF technology uses binding agents and heat to produce orthotics with exceptional speed and precision. 

  • Pros: Outstanding accuracy, fast production, smooth finishes, ideal for complex designs, and well suited to large batches 

  • Cons: Requires specialized equipment with a higher upfront cost. 


4. Material Jetting (MJ) 

This method involves jetting liquid materials that are cured layer by layer with UV light, delivering unmatched precision. 

  • Pros: Exceptional detail, multi-material capability, and high-quality finishes. 

  • Cons: Expensive and less commonly used for orthotics. 


Choosing the Right Technology 

Choosing of 3D printing technology often depends on your clinic's budget, the complexity of the orthotic design, and material requirements. For high-precision, durable orthotics, SLS and MJF are leading options, while FDM and MJ work well for simpler or more specialized needs. 

 


Exploring Material Options for 3D Printed Orthotics 


The choice of material directly impacts the strength, flexibility, and comfort of orthotics. Here are the most popular materials used in 3D printing orthotics and their key characteristics. We will be focusing on the MJF materials we offer here at Tempus 3D of course!


1. PA-12 (Nylon 12) 

A durable, flexible, and biocompatible material ideal for everyday orthotics.This is hte most common material we do by far!

  • Pros: High strength, impact resistance, and versatility. 

  • Cons: May require additional finishing for smoother surfaces. 


2. TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane) 

Known for its rubber-like flexibility, TPU is perfect for orthotics requiring cushioning and shock absorption. 

  • Pros: Excellent flexibility and comfort for patients. 

  • Cons: Less durable and may wear faster over time. 


3. PA-11 (Nylon 11) 

A lightweight, bio-based material offering similar benefits to PA-12 with added flexibility. 

  • Pros: Strong, and ideal for lightweight orthotics. 

  • Cons: Slightly more expensive than PA-12. 

 

Making the Right Choice for Your Patients 

Selecting the right 3D printing technology and material is a balancing act between performance, cost, and patient needs. While PA-12 and TPU are versatile and widely used, materials like PA-11 cater to more specific requirements. Similarly, advanced printing methods like MJF excel in precision and durability, ensuring the highest quality outcomes for patients. 

At Tempus 3D, we provide access to MJF technologies and materials, ensuring you have the right tools for any orthotic design challenge. We would love help you create orthotics that enhance patient comfort and mobility with the precision of advanced manufacturing!

 


Comments


bottom of page